From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <3e1162e60604191045p29dd11d9j246a0e94df98ebf7@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 10:45:36 -0700
From: "David Leimbach" <leimy2k@gmail.com>
To: "Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs" <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
Subject: Re: [9fans] Install from CD fails
In-Reply-To: <347ae211437520925f24f018039df049@yourdomain.dom>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <3e1162e60604190845u338bdf5cma2415dd98d024743@mail.gmail.com>
	<347ae211437520925f24f018039df049@yourdomain.dom>
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 3fb8bfb4-ead1-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

On 4/19/06, Federico G. Benavento <benavento@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On 4/19/06, Chad Dougherty <crd@andrew.cmu.edu> wrote:
>
> > Is there a way to tell what version of a static library a potentially
> > old binary is linked against?  I don't like guessing games :)
>
> ls -l, 9fs dump?
>
> Federico G. Benavento
>
>
I guess that lets me look at the library sizes to see if they've
changed then I can compare my binaries to see if they aren't the same.
 Still I don't think this ends up being a complete solution for
binaries that I'm not aware of the static library linkage.

Dave