From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <3e1162e60604191155v7cdad57u876dbc12a82f5c40@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 11:55:24 -0700
From: "David Leimbach" <leimy2k@gmail.com>
To: "Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs" <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
Subject: Re: [9fans] Install from CD fails
In-Reply-To: <22e0c9b898732bed7467a934a9f38e96@terzarima.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <3e1162e60604191050q1ff64eacma5be80e6375f8eff@mail.gmail.com>
	<22e0c9b898732bed7467a934a9f38e96@terzarima.net>
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 3fd4eec8-ead1-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

On 4/19/06, Charles Forsyth <forsyth@terzarima.net> wrote:
> i regard the libraries themselves as irrelevant and focus on the things t=
hey contain.
> those are the things that have different versions, and the version is det=
ermined by their signatures and
> code (separately).   is there anything else that matters?
>
>
True, it's the final payload of bytes from building against static
libs that counts... so it seems checksums are good enough.