From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <3e1162e60604252159i30d40955vd7643cd61ace5526@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 21:59:07 -0700
From: "David Leimbach" <leimy2k@gmail.com>
To: "Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs" <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
Subject: Re: [9fans] impressive
In-Reply-To: <57a21f730604251915y2344526ey629c2cb0de0055fb@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <cc39734bed5352393b40f65a344378c2@quanstro.net>
	<20060426005301.GF27116@submarine>
	<57a21f730604251915y2344526ey629c2cb0de0055fb@mail.gmail.com>
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 465ab764-ead1-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

On 4/25/06, Taj Khattra <taj.khattra@gmail.com> wrote:
> >   The worst of it is -- on a number of occasions glibc developers state=
d
> >   that they have no interest in supporting compilers other than gcc.
>
> http://udrepper.livejournal.com/7326.html:
>     The only OSes supported in the [glibc] tree are Linux and to some
> extend Hurd.
>     ...
>     For my new projects the razor is even sharper. Only Linux is supporte=
d...
>
> we should be eternally grateful :)
>

There are some debian BSD projects that seem to try to use glibc if I
recall correctly.