From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <3e1162e60606080802m2752b8c6vf904458042cc4961@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu,  8 Jun 2006 08:02:29 -0700
From: "David Leimbach" <leimy2k@gmail.com>
To: "Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs" <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
Subject: Re: [9fans] gcc on plan9
In-Reply-To: <2b546649b79207ea108f4ba317df0b2c@quanstro.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <C2BB6DFB-F22A-4F12-B838-B20E3A7EAD57@lanl.gov>
	<2b546649b79207ea108f4ba317df0b2c@quanstro.net>
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 614a12ea-ead1-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

On 6/7/06, quanstro@quanstro.net <quanstro@quanstro.net> wrote:
> On Wed Jun  7 20:08:54 CDT 2006, lionkov@lanl.gov wrote:
> > We have to choose between having clean system that is used by handful
> > of people, or slightly dirtier one (but still better than Linux for
> > example) that can attract more users.
> >
> > I don't think the Plan9 community has the resources (both in numbers
> > and quality) to continue the development. We need fresh blood.
>
> thanks for insulting everyone here.  i simply don't agree that the quality
> of programmers working on plan 9 is lacking.  from what i've seen it's top
> shelf.
>
> - erik
>
I think you may have zoomed in on the wrong interpretation of his
parenthesis.  I took it as  "there are good programmers in terms of
quality in the plan 9 community, but not enough."

Dave