From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <3e1162e60606080804x3823e75albd6ec25a97d1ca5a@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2006 08:04:09 -0700 From: "David Leimbach" To: "Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs" <9fans@cse.psu.edu> Subject: Re: [9fans] gcc on plan9 In-Reply-To: <448799F5.4010805@lanl.gov> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <448799F5.4010805@lanl.gov> Topicbox-Message-UUID: 61510564-ead1-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 On 6/7/06, Ronald G Minnich wrote: > Steve Simon wrote: > > > Many people have told me that cfront is just not up to the job, > > it was never that satisfying an experience. We were all pretty happy > when the native C++ compilers showed up -- er, well, as happy as you can > be with C++, that is. > > ron > it's somewhat funny that now the best C++ compilers in existence are pretty much CFront-like again then isn't it? :-)