From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <3e1162e60606082225l20bffad6ufd5e6394d2a89767@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu,  8 Jun 2006 22:25:57 -0700
From: "David Leimbach" <leimy2k@gmail.com>
To: "Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs" <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
Subject: Re: [9fans] gcc on plan9
In-Reply-To: <37d3faed5a5fe3f0e856ee5d6367ee0c@quanstro.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <3e1162e60606080710n4252680fp3720965689e6342a@mail.gmail.com>
	<37d3faed5a5fe3f0e856ee5d6367ee0c@quanstro.net>
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 63377534-ead1-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

On 6/8/06, quanstro@quanstro.net <quanstro@quanstro.net> wrote:
> On Thu Jun  8 09:11:58 CDT 2006, leimy2k@gmail.com wrote:
> > GNU Fortran is actually fairly well caught up with F95 at least.  I've
> > seen traffic on the apple scitech list saying that f2c is completely
> > inadequate for modern fortran codes.
>
> modern fortran.  two words that should never share the space between
> the double-space and the period.
>
> - erik
>

*shrug* there's a lot of new (ish) fortran out there to support for
HPC.  I don't have much of a choice in my job :-).