From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <3e1162e60606090839v7cb294b9s4ef423d27257fae4@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2006 08:39:50 -0700 From: "David Leimbach" To: "Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs" <9fans@cse.psu.edu> Subject: Re: [9fans] gcc on plan9 In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <200606090810.35322.corey_s@qwest.net> Topicbox-Message-UUID: 6482f92c-ead1-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 On 6/9/06, C H Forsyth wrote: > i don't think there is a language police here. > if there is a language you'd like, and you can > find an implementation that can be ported, > or you can implement it yourself, then just do it. > Yep, I've been known to use Python or Scheme or Haskell on Plan 9 from time to time. There's a newer version of Hugs out there now that I think about it, not sure if anyone's ported to plan 9 yet. Dave