From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <3e1162e60606140821h58108b75p5235edb9337f0d18@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2006 08:21:44 -0700 From: "David Leimbach" To: "Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs" <9fans@cse.psu.edu> Subject: Re: [9fans] Parallels Mac OS X Configuration document (networking is In-Reply-To: <44901ED4.7040805@lanl.gov> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <3AF26F5605627543BEC429636A522290235B59@rohrpostix.xplain.local> <44901ED4.7040805@lanl.gov> Topicbox-Message-UUID: 6a9b779e-ead1-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 On 6/14/06, Ronald G Minnich wrote: > Retzki, Sascha [Xplain] wrote: > >>-----Original Message----- > >>Another interesting path might be to run Plan 9 like L4 Linux using L4 > >>as the "hypervisor" of sorts. Linux seems to do better on L4 than on > >>Xen performance wise by some numbers I've seen. > > > > > > RAVE MODE: ON > > Maybe because of the XML-RPC in Xen... > > EOR > > as much as I dislike xml-rpc in xen, that is not an issue here. > > let me know if you get l4 to actually *build* on linux ... I've cross compiled it many times on PowerPC Macs with an ELF toolchain. I've not tried it recently though on any platform, but I have plans to. That was just the demo applications though all built together into a "piggybacked" binary, since there was no GRUB available for multi-boot loading on PPC at the time. (though GRUB2 is supposed to support that) I presume we're talking about Pistachio also? Dave > > ron >