From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <3e1162e60607251528o1b2e832dx21602abb54401875@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 15:28:47 -0700 From: "David Leimbach" To: "Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs" <9fans@cse.psu.edu> Subject: Re: Re: [9fans] Re: 9fans Digest, Vol 27, Issue 52 In-Reply-To: <8ccc8ba40607251423i5bbc79e2obc11e7640b57b449@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <44C5F39C.3010002@syntelos.com> <83403ad2ab9a0c44be1bef3d89406b63@quanstro.net> <8ccc8ba40607251423i5bbc79e2obc11e7640b57b449@mail.gmail.com> Topicbox-Message-UUID: 8d0cdd54-ead1-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 On 7/25/06, Francisco J Ballesteros wrote: > Just curious. Anyone besides us at urjc tried omero? > It has images, as well as bugs :-) It has been a long time since I tried omero... I want to again, soon. Mainly I think I remember a feature that once I got my windows laid out the way I wanted to I could essentially "tar" them up then untar again to restore the layout. Is this correct? Like i said, It's been a while :-) Dave > > > On 7/25/06, erik quanstrom wrote: > > i think the ideal "browser" for plan 9 would be acme. > > > > if acme could handle a box-based layout with images and text, the > > "web browser" could consist of webfs, http/layout and http/acmectl. > > > > (giving acme the ability to display images inline with text would make > > replacing rio with acme more palatable.) > > > > - erik > > > > On Tue Jul 25 05:36:25 CDT 2006, jdp@syntelos.com wrote: > > > If we were to formulate mozilla for an OS like Plan9 or Inferno, what > > > would be different in that software architecture? One can either > > > descend into the endless void of great possibilities, or truncate that > > > space at a first stage (it's just an HTTP client) and then start over > > > from scratch for a second (it's a world of multi-protocol clients). > > > Maintain sanity. > > > > >