From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <3e1162e60608291314n19d1e419vbe20c7e24a51f62@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 13:14:24 -0700
From: "David Leimbach" <leimy2k@gmail.com>
To: "Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs" <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
Subject: Re: Re: [9fans] linux il/ip
In-Reply-To: <5c56564016f8e5c037e36adc796f70a8@quanstro.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <21fffd77c3f483b17d11250b8fdcc979@9netics.com>
	<5c56564016f8e5c037e36adc796f70a8@quanstro.net>
Topicbox-Message-UUID: a9e52832-ead1-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

On 8/29/06, erik quanstrom <quanstro@quanstro.net> wrote:
> i'm not sure il's completely moot.  has anybody done any tcp vs il performance
> measurements on gigabit or 10 gigibit networks, including cpu usage?
>
> the fact that it doesn't route well over the internet shouldn't be too much of a
> bother most of the time.  my only problem is that of all the protocols that linux
> choose to implement, il wasn't one of them. ;-)

Tell me you don't use the ham radio support every day....

>
> - erik
>