From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <3e1162e60609011016o1cff353eu81d06cc9651e1db6@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri,  1 Sep 2006 10:16:46 -0700
From: "David Leimbach" <leimy2k@gmail.com>
To: "Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs" <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
Subject: Re: Re: Re: [9fans] linux il/ip
In-Reply-To: <27600125f6a8eb98666fef278575bb39@quanstro.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <3e1162e60609010934s4f9ab84ib1f36454dddc7581@mail.gmail.com>
	<27600125f6a8eb98666fef278575bb39@quanstro.net>
Topicbox-Message-UUID: add0a62e-ead1-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

On 9/1/06, erik quanstrom <quanstro@quanstro.net> wrote:
> good points.  but i wasn't trying to address that question.
>
> i was trying to point out that there are a few alternative
> protocols, but they are (at least according to the linux
> implementation) huge and with the possible exception of sctp,
> not very useful for plan 9.
>
> - erik
>

Well in that case I agree :-).

SCTP could be interesting to add to Plan 9.  Would it require DARPA
funding or an NSF grant? :-)