From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <3e1162e60612121633s4ffe5139m8a950289ad360c84@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 16:33:37 -0800 From: "David Leimbach" To: "Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs" <9fans@cse.psu.edu> Subject: Re: [9fans] Plan9 under parallels; kernel rebuild In-Reply-To: <89368918-8FE2-4CAA-9656-56A959FCB78F@telus.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <89368918-8FE2-4CAA-9656-56A959FCB78F@telus.net> Topicbox-Message-UUID: f350bf36-ead1-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 keep in mind that the source that runs well on parallels is not the same as the source on sources. I don't know if the BIOS changes JMK did ever got merged in. Dave On 12/12/06, Paul Lalonde wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > I've been following David Leimbach's directions on getting plan9 to > run under parallels, and have run into a glitch while rebuilding the > kernel. At link I get: > configure: undefined: pcibussize in configure > > Any quick clues as to what's up? It's a recent plan9 iso - about 2 > weeks old. > > Paul > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin) > > iD8DBQFFf0b3pJeHo/Fbu1wRAsAPAJ0UYwAfsIJqzk39qfbEi94pWt9gpgCggmK8 > wM4r9Hh68/NAvxaT7V8UseE= > =gRh0 > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- >