Re: [9fans] a quick and simple minded study of configure.

["David Leimbach" <leimy2k@gmail.com>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1825 bytes --]

On 6/15/07, Skip Tavakkolian <9nut@9netics.com> wrote:
>
> > I'm pretty sure I'm not good at it yet but I always found this one
> > line. "word counter" impressive.
> >
> >  std::distance(std::istream_iterator<std::string>(std::cin),
> > std::istream_iterator<std::string>());
>
> it is impressive that you typed that on a blackberry!


I'm not going to tell you that it was easy :-)


it's not short, if you count the class implementation.  it doesn't
> convey the idea - the solution is not understood unless you
> understand each piece.


I disagree, to the extent that it really is short, in that it's one line :-)

I agree as your point is 100% valid that if you don't know distance,
istream_iterator, what cin is, and how it deals with "std::string", that you
wouldn't know how to write that line, and you possibly wouldn't understand
how it works.

But I suspect any person dealing with C++ has an idea how the STL and
Standard C++ Library works.  What might still not be obvious is that that
you need certain restrictions on iterators for STL to work (don't
stable_sort on list iterators, as you probably need something with random
access, not bi-directional iterators).  (ok that was a bit tongue-in-cheek)

No wonder there's so much money in C++ books  :-)

i think what Ron is bringing up is having/learning the ability to
> see through layers of filters to the exact need and providing a
> design that is just the right distance between "pie in the sky" and
> "failure of vision".
>
> Yep, I was trying to point out that sometimes less code is more headache
:-)

Of course when the plane door closes you have to shut off your phone so I
don't think I got that across very well :-).

At any rate, I'm hoping that's NOT what was meant by "Bell Labs Lines"  :-)

Dave

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2977 bytes --]