From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <3e1162e60708081133p6f1919bbt8ab2ce1bc14e9ecc@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2007 11:33:00 -0700 From: "David Leimbach" To: "Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs" <9fans@cse.psu.edu> Subject: Re: [9fans] Bay Area Plan 9 Users Group Meeting (August '07) In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_1409_31884780.1186597980439" References: <13426df10708081013t7e4d0072g21f154bca5c94336@mail.gmail.com> Topicbox-Message-UUID: a01e6330-ead2-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 ------=_Part_1409_31884780.1186597980439 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline On 8/8/07, Charles Forsyth wrote: > > asynchrony => a process. > this Erlang and (to a lesser degree, in terms of its scaling) Inferno get > right. > > Erlang really is quite good at this. Does it just boil down to the way in which processes are implemented? ------=_Part_1409_31884780.1186597980439 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline

On 8/8/07, Charles Forsyth <forsyth@terzarima.net> wrote:
asynchrony => a process.
this Erlang and (to a lesser degree, in terms of its scaling) Inferno get right.


Erlang really is quite good at this.  Does it just boil down to the way in which processes are implemented?




------=_Part_1409_31884780.1186597980439--