From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <3e1162e60709261156h26d41971t83d5b4a5658407ab@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 11:56:54 -0700
From: "David Leimbach" <leimy2k@gmail.com>
To: "Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs" <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
	boundary="----=_Part_5245_16492976.1190833014684"
Subject: [9fans] ssh v 2 status
Topicbox-Message-UUID: c5b6b156-ead2-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

------=_Part_5245_16492976.1190833014684
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

Saw a port of OpenSSL for Plan 9, but not one for OpenSSH.
Also I'm not sure how stalled or "where stalled" the more "native" ssh v2
implementation is, or even if I have the skills to help with that.

I do know that I'm liking having only ssh v2 authentication to my machines
though, and that I love sshnet on Plan 9 a great deal :-)

Dave

------=_Part_5245_16492976.1190833014684
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

Saw a port of OpenSSL for Plan 9, but not one for OpenSSH.<div><br class="webkit-block-placeholder"></div><div>Also I&#39;m not sure how stalled or &quot;where stalled&quot; the more &quot;native&quot; ssh v2 implementation is, or even if I have the skills to help with that.
</div><div><br class="webkit-block-placeholder"></div><div>I do know that I&#39;m liking having only ssh v2 authentication to my machines though, and that I love sshnet on Plan 9 a great deal :-)</div><div><br class="webkit-block-placeholder">
</div><div>Dave</div>

------=_Part_5245_16492976.1190833014684--