From: "David Leimbach" <leimy2k@gmail.com>
To: "Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs" <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
Subject: Re: [9fans] Re: what about microkernel?
Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2007 13:20:20 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3e1162e60710071320h35294ffdv8198d907787c9938@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <feb8v3$4d0$1@sea.gmane.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 966 bytes --]
On 10/7/07, Andrew Wingorodov <mail@andr.ru> wrote:
>
> David Leimbach <leimy2k@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On 10/6/07, Charles Forsyth <forsyth@terzarima.net> wrote:
> >> qnx is probably the most reasonable so-called microkernel
> >> i've seen described
> >> (but i haven't seen their code).
> >
> > It's "open sourced" now, as of a few weeks ago.
>
> its was realy great news of a few weeks ago, i was squatting
> free and openqnx in ORG zones for fork of this project
> (if the owner will be wants to close the code again :)
>
> But IMH professonal O, the plan is much better.
> After all, IHateThisNotation() :)
>
> > Ever looked at the L4 family of microkernels?
>
> Linux is not interesting
> Lots of noise from nowhere
>
L4 has basically nothing to do with Linux. There are ports of Linux to L4,
using it as a hardware architecture though, which provides many of the
benefits of things like Xen (running multiple instances of Linux etc)
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1382 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-10-07 20:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-10-06 13:25 [9fans] " Andrew Wingorodov
2007-10-06 16:07 ` Lorenzo Fernando Bivens de la Fuente
2007-10-06 16:08 ` johnny
2007-10-06 16:26 ` Charles Forsyth
2007-10-06 20:24 ` [9fans] " Andrew Wingorodov
2007-10-06 20:50 ` Charles Forsyth
2007-10-07 16:18 ` David Leimbach
2007-10-07 16:30 ` ron minnich
2007-10-07 18:05 ` erik quanstrom
2007-10-07 20:28 ` David Leimbach
2007-10-07 20:49 ` Francisco J Ballesteros
2007-10-08 13:20 ` LiteStar numnums
2007-10-08 13:27 ` Charles Forsyth
2007-10-08 14:50 ` erik quanstrom
2007-10-08 15:58 ` Eric Van Hensbergen
2007-10-08 16:01 ` Francisco J Ballesteros
2007-10-08 17:16 ` erik quanstrom
2007-10-08 19:14 ` Eric Van Hensbergen
2007-10-08 19:53 ` Charles Forsyth
2007-10-08 20:18 ` Eric Van Hensbergen
2007-10-10 18:26 ` David Leimbach
2007-10-10 20:42 ` ron minnich
2007-10-10 21:38 ` David Leimbach
2007-10-08 17:46 ` Charles Forsyth
2007-10-08 18:39 ` David Leimbach
2007-10-08 19:11 ` Eric Van Hensbergen
2007-10-08 18:34 ` David Leimbach
2007-10-07 16:31 ` LiteStar numnums
2007-10-07 18:36 ` Andrew Wingorodov
2007-10-07 18:54 ` LiteStar numnums
2007-10-07 20:20 ` David Leimbach [this message]
2007-10-13 7:08 ` Andrew Wingorodov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3e1162e60710071320h35294ffdv8198d907787c9938@mail.gmail.com \
--to=leimy2k@gmail.com \
--cc=9fans@cse.psu.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).