From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <3e1162e60710231527k71c2c1deqe5c5149548fb2640@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 15:27:52 -0700
From: "David Leimbach" <leimy2k@gmail.com>
To: "Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs" <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
Subject: Re: [9fans] A probably stupid question on portability
In-Reply-To: <13426df10710231210o2ac74db9l77d71813eebf95c6@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; 
	boundary="----=_Part_1663_7856332.1193178472428"
References: <13426df10710231210o2ac74db9l77d71813eebf95c6@mail.gmail.com>
Topicbox-Message-UUID: d759f17a-ead2-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

------=_Part_1663_7856332.1193178472428
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

On 10/23/07, ron minnich <rminnich@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Is this construct portable at this point? c99 or whatever? Or is it
> gcc-centric?
>
> #if defined(_INCLUDED_GASNET_INTERNAL_H) && !defined(_IN_GASNET_INTERNAL_H
> )
>
>
>
> ron
>

It's in the C99 standard.

------=_Part_1663_7856332.1193178472428
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

<br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 10/23/07, <b class="gmail_sendername">ron minnich</b> &lt;<a href="mailto:rminnich@gmail.com">rminnich@gmail.com</a>&gt; wrote:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0;margin-left:0.8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
Is this construct portable at this point? c99 or whatever? Or is it gcc-centric?<br><br>#if defined(_INCLUDED_GASNET_INTERNAL_H) &amp;&amp; !defined(_IN_GASNET_INTERNAL_H)<br><br><br><br>ron<br></blockquote></div><br><div>
It&#39;s in the C99 standard.</div><div><br class="webkit-block-placeholder"></div>

------=_Part_1663_7856332.1193178472428--