On 10/25/07, Charles Forsyth <forsyth@terzarima.net> wrote:
>
> > Have you ever ran into a thread implementation where two threads
> > could *not* directly access each other's .bss (or equiv)/heap?
> > i.e. have you ever encountered a scenario where sibling threads
> > actually had completely separate sets of page tables?
>
> yes. erlang processes do not share memory (and it is used in embedded
> real-time applications).
>
>
> Aren't those processes though and not threads?