On 10/25/07, Charles Forsyth <forsyth@terzarima.net> wrote:
> Have you ever ran into a thread implementation where two threads
> could *not* directly access each other's .bss (or equiv)/heap?
> i.e. have you ever encountered a scenario where sibling threads
> actually had completely separate sets of page tables?

yes. erlang processes do not share memory (and it is used in embedded real-time applications).


Aren't those processes though and not threads?