From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <3e1162e60711111012u5d3f741fxce3baa73c74c6163@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 11 Nov 2007 10:12:38 -0800 From: "David Leimbach" To: "Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs" <9fans@cse.psu.edu> Subject: Re: [9fans] OT: New Obj-C runtime In-Reply-To: <6e35c0620711110922o329993f4x4277912f8a0a4d9c@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <6e35c0620711110922o329993f4x4277912f8a0a4d9c@mail.gmail.com> Topicbox-Message-UUID: f33fedf4-ead2-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 On Nov 11, 2007 9:22 AM, Jack Johnson wrote: > Off-topic, as always, I thought some folks might find this > interesting, if not humorous: > > https://mail.gna.org/public/etoile-dev/2007-11/msg00000.html > > >From the overview: > > "The other runtime, currently used by GNUstep, is the GNU runtime. I > have done a little work on this and submitted a patch to allow > prototype-based object orientation to be supported. There are a few > problems with this runtime: > [...] > - It is written in GNU coding style, which hurts my eyes and brain." > > "The existing GNU runtime is 11,688 lines.3 The new runtime weights in > at a little over 10% of this size. Note that the size for the new > library includes test cases and examples, while the GNU version does > not. In terms of compiled code, the new library is closer to 15% of > the size of the GNU implementation. The entire library was written by > one person over two days, which should give some idea of its > simplicity." > > -Jack > Yeah, that's not terribly surprising, given what I've seen of GNU projects :-). People often think things are harder than they need to be due to the work other people have done. It seems the most interesting innovations come from people who usually "don't know any better". Saw a great mug the other day that said "What would you attempt to do if you knew you couldn't fail?" ...or something like that. I should have bought it :-) Dave