9fans - fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "David Leimbach" <leimy2k@gmail.com>
To: "Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs" <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
Subject: Re: [9fans] thousands of interrupts per second
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2007 07:27:12 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3e1162e60711210727h726b4f5bnf38af241c95a209c@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <14ec7b180711210651p27c40969v5ccde883e66ce2f0@mail.gmail.com>

On Nov 21, 2007 6:51 AM, andrey mirtchovski <mirtchovski@gmail.com> wrote:
> that is probably correct. doesn't amd only "suggest" the clock
> frequency to be what they think the processor speed is when compared
> to the original 1GHz Athlon?

Yeah their product numbers are not really the clock speed.  My
understanding is they were saying  an Athlon 2800 was clocked slower
but still about as fast as an Intel at 2800... but that might just be
my own bad memory.

>
> what is the current time reported by the system? try running timesync
> and monitor the cpufreq for sudden increase/decreases. of course that
> may have nothing to do with your real problem, but i have experience
> high interrupt counts after timesync mangled my cpufreq :)
>

Starting timesync from the live cd does cause a lot of interrupts yes.
 But my network wasn't configured either, which is seemingly the same
thing going on with my plan 9 installation since I didn't configure
any network.

perhaps timesync should not be on in the default installed
distribution, and users should turn that on themselves once they have
their network configured properly?

>
> > At this point I'm booted from the Plan 9 CD and it says I've an
> > AMD-Athlon 2080.... it is, in fact, an Athlon XP 2800+
> >
>


  reply	other threads:[~2007-11-21 15:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-11-20 22:35 David Leimbach
2007-11-21  0:08 ` erik quanstrom
2007-11-21  0:21   ` andrey mirtchovski
2007-11-21 14:28     ` David Leimbach
2007-11-21 14:34       ` David Leimbach
2007-11-21 14:34       ` andrey mirtchovski
2007-11-21 14:45         ` David Leimbach
2007-11-21 14:47           ` erik quanstrom
2007-11-21 15:12             ` David Leimbach
2007-11-21 14:51           ` andrey mirtchovski
2007-11-21 15:27             ` David Leimbach [this message]
2007-11-21 15:38               ` David Leimbach
2007-11-21 16:06                 ` Russ Cox
2007-11-21 16:14                   ` David Leimbach
2007-11-21 18:28                     ` Gabriel Diaz
2007-11-21 18:42                       ` David Leimbach
2007-11-21 18:50                         ` erik quanstrom
2007-11-21 14:28   ` David Leimbach

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3e1162e60711210727h726b4f5bnf38af241c95a209c@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=leimy2k@gmail.com \
    --cc=9fans@cse.psu.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).