On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 8:18 PM, andrey mirtchovski wrote: > I think that with a bit more work, porting the Ocaml native compiler > to Plan 9 would give you a bigger benefit than GHC (which is unwieldy) > or an interpreter such as Hugs. Having a higher-level language in > which to write native applications will, perhaps, give more people a > viable reason to explore the system. Ocaml's compiler generates > high-quality, reasonably fast code and a native port effort would be > much less than the one for a similar Haskell compiler. > > Just a thought. > > A perfectly reasonable one too... OCaml may increase in popularity now that F# is perhaps also picking up momentum, and they're both ML dialects. Dave