9fans - fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Leimbach <leimy2k@gmail.com>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
Subject: Re: [9fans] linux reinvents factotum, secstore ...
Date: Sat,  8 Aug 2009 07:44:31 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3e1162e60908080744u7ebdb566md4089d5d2b12f17f@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5C4D0696-0464-407B-AB72-71CE0371C302@storytotell.org>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1221 bytes --]

On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 10:34 AM, Daniel Lyons <fusion@storytotell.org>wrote:

>
> On Aug 7, 2009, at 7:06 AM, Ethan Grammatikidis wrote:
>
>  X11 isn't a desktop, it tries very hard not to define a look and feel, but
>> it has to include inter-app communications to support the supposedly
>> desirable drag & drop as well as any copy/paste beyond plain text. In fact
>> my big beef with dbus is that everything is all hot-all-over about dbus when
>> it needs to be using X IPC.
>>
>
>
> My beef is that they were hot-all-over CORBA not too long ago. I expect in
> another three years nobody will be using D-Bus, they'll be using some new
> layer that sits on top of it... ad nauseam. Outside Plan 9 I don't see
> anyone solving two problems with one technology; instead, they're just
> solving one problem and introducing a new one.


Yeah they were hot on CORBA, and KDE folks were doing DCOP, which was
derived from some X11 ICE thing... Neither of them was that great, and
somehow they've both come back to DBUS.

I don't honestly know the rhyme or reason for any of it.  Anyone who thought
CORBA was the answer didn't seem to understand the question.


>
>
> —
> Daniel Lyons
>
>
>

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1801 bytes --]

  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-08-08 14:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-08-06 18:13 erik quanstrom
2009-08-06 19:33 ` Daniel Lyons
2009-08-06 19:38   ` erik quanstrom
2009-08-07  1:39   ` Roman Shaposhnik
2009-08-07  2:52     ` Daniel Lyons
2009-08-07  3:03     ` erik quanstrom
2009-08-07  4:38       ` ron minnich
2009-08-07 13:06       ` Ethan Grammatikidis
2009-08-07 17:34         ` Daniel Lyons
2009-08-07 17:37           ` ron minnich
2009-08-07 17:46             ` Daniel Lyons
2009-08-08 14:44           ` David Leimbach [this message]
2009-08-08 17:12             ` Uriel
2009-08-07  1:30 ` Roman Shaposhnik

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3e1162e60908080744u7ebdb566md4089d5d2b12f17f@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=leimy2k@gmail.com \
    --cc=9fans@9fans.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).