On Sun, Sep 6, 2009 at 4:03 PM, Uriel <lost.goblin@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 4:56 PM, David Leimbach<leimy2k@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 7:20 AM, erik quanstrom <quanstro@quanstro.net>
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> > I could be wrong, but I feel like you're not really interested in
> >> > entertaining that this idea could be useful, but more interested in
> >> > shooting
> >> > it down [...]
> >>
> >> remember, if a guy says to the king, hey you're fly's undone,
> >> we send that guy to the stockades for a week.  meanwhile
> >> the king's fly remains undone.
> >>
> >> since the raison d'etre of blocks is ease of programming,
> >> i would think it would follow that it should be uniformly
> >> easier across the board.  if there are big exceptions to this
> >> (like extra locking), i would think the feature would earn
> >> a fail.
> >>
> >
> > I am totally agreeing with you so far on all points you've just made.
>  And I
> > think that's why Apple is seeking feedback.
>
> Here is some feedback for Apple: Fire your whole software and
> programming division, they are making the GNU and Gnome crack monkeys
> look sane, competent and responsible.
>
> uriel
>
>
> Why am I not surprised that this is your reaction?  At least you're
consistent :-)