9fans - fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Leimbach <leimy2k@gmail.com>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
Subject: Re: [9fans] Plan 9 on L4
Date: Thu,  7 Jan 2010 00:28:16 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3e1162e61001070028j609aa030g66b3642ffee3be5c@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bf64731d1001070014j23a376fch408951be9f422bc7@mail.gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1315 bytes --]

This looks really great!  Thanks!

On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 12:14 AM, YAMANASHI Takeshi <9.nashi@gmail.com>wrote:

> As I heard, the largest work in porting Plan 9 to L4 enviroment
> is rewriting Plan 9's C code base  to be compiled on gcc
> as L4 uses the compiler for its development.
>
> The developers of LP49 themselves could chime in, but here is the link
> to the project.
> You might be surprised how much of Plan 9 has been rewritten in LP49.
>
> http://research.nii.ac.jp/H2O/LP49/LP49-e.html
> --
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 3:48 PM, David Leimbach <leimy2k@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Recently found a paper (again) documenting some work going on here.
> > I've lately sort of had a resurrected interest in OKL4, and I'm always
> > interested in Plan 9 stuff, so I was wondering what's happened here or if
> > there's any code to show for it.
> > It seems like an effort that would take more than one person, but I'm
> > spending some of my spare time investigating L4 a little more in depth
> than
> > I had previously, and trying to understand what it would take to port
> Plan 9
> > to this platform.
> > I'm not announcing this as a project at this point, as I don't know what
> the
> > heck kind of time I'm going to have.
> > Dave
>
>
>
> --
> YAMANASHI Takeshi
>
>

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1863 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2010-01-07  8:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-01-07  6:48 David Leimbach
2010-01-07  8:14 ` YAMANASHI Takeshi
2010-01-07  8:28   ` David Leimbach [this message]
2010-01-07  8:46     ` David Leimbach
2010-01-08 17:59   ` Tim Newsham
2010-01-08 15:57     ` Patrick Kelly
2010-01-08 18:10     ` lucio
2010-01-08 18:47       ` Corey Thomasson
2010-01-08 19:01         ` lucio
2010-01-08 19:02         ` ron minnich
2010-01-08 19:45           ` Dave Eckhardt
2010-01-08 21:35           ` Richard Miller
2010-01-08 18:59     ` David Leimbach
2010-01-08 19:43       ` Tim Newsham
2010-01-08 16:58         ` Patrick Kelly
2010-01-08 19:57         ` Eric Van Hensbergen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3e1162e61001070028j609aa030g66b3642ffee3be5c@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=leimy2k@gmail.com \
    --cc=9fans@9fans.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).