From: David Leimbach <leimy2k@gmail.com>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
Subject: Re: [9fans] Plan 9 on L4
Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 00:28:16 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3e1162e61001070028j609aa030g66b3642ffee3be5c@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bf64731d1001070014j23a376fch408951be9f422bc7@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1315 bytes --]
This looks really great! Thanks!
On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 12:14 AM, YAMANASHI Takeshi <9.nashi@gmail.com>wrote:
> As I heard, the largest work in porting Plan 9 to L4 enviroment
> is rewriting Plan 9's C code base to be compiled on gcc
> as L4 uses the compiler for its development.
>
> The developers of LP49 themselves could chime in, but here is the link
> to the project.
> You might be surprised how much of Plan 9 has been rewritten in LP49.
>
> http://research.nii.ac.jp/H2O/LP49/LP49-e.html
> --
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 3:48 PM, David Leimbach <leimy2k@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Recently found a paper (again) documenting some work going on here.
> > I've lately sort of had a resurrected interest in OKL4, and I'm always
> > interested in Plan 9 stuff, so I was wondering what's happened here or if
> > there's any code to show for it.
> > It seems like an effort that would take more than one person, but I'm
> > spending some of my spare time investigating L4 a little more in depth
> than
> > I had previously, and trying to understand what it would take to port
> Plan 9
> > to this platform.
> > I'm not announcing this as a project at this point, as I don't know what
> the
> > heck kind of time I'm going to have.
> > Dave
>
>
>
> --
> YAMANASHI Takeshi
>
>
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1863 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-01-07 8:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-01-07 6:48 David Leimbach
2010-01-07 8:14 ` YAMANASHI Takeshi
2010-01-07 8:28 ` David Leimbach [this message]
2010-01-07 8:46 ` David Leimbach
2010-01-08 17:59 ` Tim Newsham
2010-01-08 15:57 ` Patrick Kelly
2010-01-08 18:10 ` lucio
2010-01-08 18:47 ` Corey Thomasson
2010-01-08 19:01 ` lucio
2010-01-08 19:02 ` ron minnich
2010-01-08 19:45 ` Dave Eckhardt
2010-01-08 21:35 ` Richard Miller
2010-01-08 18:59 ` David Leimbach
2010-01-08 19:43 ` Tim Newsham
2010-01-08 16:58 ` Patrick Kelly
2010-01-08 19:57 ` Eric Van Hensbergen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3e1162e61001070028j609aa030g66b3642ffee3be5c@mail.gmail.com \
--to=leimy2k@gmail.com \
--cc=9fans@9fans.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).