From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <80c99e791001240502v3e7c955ek130ded319bb03ef5@mail.gmail.com> <80c99e791001240955m726daae0w16d5f1ab4454d7ee@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2010 12:09:32 -0800 Message-ID: <3e1162e61001241209j1593ad03m3183aae443427c92@mail.gmail.com> From: David Leimbach To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0cd177108711ec047deea1e5 Subject: Re: [9fans] mount acme on plan9port Topicbox-Message-UUID: c6284f7a-ead5-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 --000e0cd177108711ec047deea1e5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 How about on MacFUSE? I remember there being some issues there. In fact, I'm now using an SSHFS that is *not* a FUSE module, but a pretty nicely done independent implementation. Dave On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 11:27 AM, Russ Cox wrote: > plan9port works well with FUSE. > It works less well with the 9p module. > > Assuming you have write permission on /mnt/acme > and FUSE installed, > > acme -m /mnt/acme > > should work just fine. > > Russ > > --000e0cd177108711ec047deea1e5 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable How about on MacFUSE? =A0I remember there being some issues there. =A0In fa= ct, I'm now using an SSHFS that is *not* a FUSE module, but a pretty ni= cely done independent implementation.

Dave

On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 11:27 AM, Russ Cox <rsc@swtch.com> wrote:
plan9port works well with FUSE.
It works less well with the 9p module.

Assuming you have write permission on /mnt/acme
and FUSE installed,

acme -m /mnt/acme

should work just fine.

Russ


--000e0cd177108711ec047deea1e5--