From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <0604d33bbe0e38e8ba8bd088197a31b6@coraid.com> Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2010 09:47:11 -0800 Message-ID: <3e1162e61003110947g24352c5bqdb23f8df1aad8ce5@mail.gmail.com> From: David Leimbach To: ebo@sandien.com, Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0cd51d722030a404818a01a0 Subject: Re: [9fans] build system: [was: (no subject)] Topicbox-Message-UUID: e6397a78-ead5-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 --000e0cd51d722030a404818a01a0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 9:14 AM, EBo wrote: > > > > Sorry for disappearing since last Friday -- emergency house repairs. Uggg > I feel like I've been beaten by mutant ninja dwarfs armed with... > something > only semi soft. Uggg. > > > here's the full list of dynamic libraries used on > > a random gentoo box i tried: > > ... > > libX11.so.6 ... > > updated the ebuild. I did not know about ldd. Thanks! > > I'll send this for a final Gentoo-Sunrise review before submitting > both updated date specific versions and a live mercurial ebuild AFTER > Fridays GSoC deadline. > > > > I've also started on updating an old per-application portage ebuild > based on > > > Anant's work back in 2007. If that is of any interest maybe I could > get you > > > to either collaborate or just do a little testing. > > > > p9p is ment to work as a unit. i think it would > > be better if you didn't. > > sorry for not being clear. I am working on ebuilds for plan9port, > glendix, and (cross)compilation of an entire Plan9 system. > Per-application ebuilds are only appropriate for glendix kernel and > compilation of Plan9. But if people think that it is a red herring > I'll drop the latter. > > Is there any latest news on Glendix at this point? Last I'd heard they had Plan 9's binaries supported at the kernel in at least some basic way. > EBo -- > > --000e0cd51d722030a404818a01a0 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 9:14 AM, EBo <ebo@sandien.com&g= t; wrote:



Sorry for disappearing since last Friday -- emergency house repairs. =A0Ugg= g
I feel like I've been beaten by mutant ninja dwarfs armed with... =A0so= mething
only semi soft. =A0Uggg.

> here's the full list of dynamic libraries used on
> a random gentoo box i tried:
> ...
> =A0 =A0 =A0 libX11.so.6 ...

updated the ebuild. =A0I did not know about ldd. =A0Thanks!

I'll send this for a final Gentoo-Sunrise review before submitting
both updated date specific versions and a live mercurial ebuild AFTER
Fridays GSoC deadline.

> > I've also started on updating an old per-application portage = ebuild based on
> > Anant's work back in 2007. =A0If that is of any interest mayb= e I could get you
> > to either collaborate or just do a little testing.
>
> p9p is ment to work as a unit. =A0i think it would
> be better if you didn't.

sorry for not being clear. =A0I am working on ebuilds for plan9port,
glendix, and (cross)compilation of an entire Plan9 system.
Per-application ebuilds are only appropriate for glendix kernel and
compilation of Plan9. =A0But if people think that it is a red herring
I'll drop the latter.


Is ther= e any latest news on Glendix at this point? =A0Last I'd heard they had = Plan 9's binaries supported at the kernel in at least some basic way.
=A0
=A0EBo --


--000e0cd51d722030a404818a01a0--