From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
From: "boyd, rounin" <boyd@cs.su.oz.au>
Message-ID: <3ec62061$0$10158$79c14f64@nan-newsreader-03.noos.net>
References: <3EB9E853.7040405@null.net>, <4bb7193815221f5e70d7548882f9109a@vitanuova.com>, <3EBB29D8.7030200@null.net>
Subject: Re: [9fans] same functions everywhere
Date: Mon, 19 May 2003 09:46:25 +0000
Topicbox-Message-UUID: b34253b0-eacb-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025

"Douglas A. Gwyn" <DAGwyn@null.net> a �crit dans le message de
news:3EBB29D8.7030200@null.net...
> Well, I don't want to get into a debate about that; suffice
> it to say that "get next character" is, to me, a function
> that cannot be performed when there is no next character ...

that's what peekc() macros are for :)