From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <3edc1641001c2e8d7f7e55f7a029ea7f@proxima.alt.za> To: 9fans@9fans.net From: Lucio De Re Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2011 13:31:55 +0200 In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [9fans] nanosleep()? Topicbox-Message-UUID: 3bb05b92-ead7-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 > after looking at the source, i'd say nanosleep is the least of your troubles. You think that once it compiles, it will not work as required? I have not looked very deeply under the bonnet, so I must have missed important details. ++L