From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <3f90c52f2d3a097adb1c92a16636d9f3@plan9.bell-labs.com>
From: "Russ Cox" <rsc@plan9.bell-labs.com>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] Channel casting
In-Reply-To: <d770e27d2897bc7e3f0638d36f554c27@vitanuova.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Wed, 21 May 2003 13:26:09 -0400
Topicbox-Message-UUID: b5ae01c6-eacb-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025

> sometimes this makes things simpler; other times, sending a reply
> channel makes more sense (particularly when the kind of reply might
> depend on the particular request).

also when the timing of the reply might depend on the particular request.