From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: erik quanstrom Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2010 21:13:07 -0500 To: 9fans@9fans.net Message-ID: <3fd76f1b4c284fa29587b509a7d79b2a@plug.quanstro.net> In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [9fans] gumstix displays Topicbox-Message-UUID: 89b79414-ead6-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 On Wed Dec 8 19:00:57 EST 2010, slawmaster@gmail.com wrote: > On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 6:29 PM, hiro <23hiro@googlemail.com> wrote: > > There have been cheaper terminals for ages. > > But small may look nice in some cases... > > > > > > If you can point me at such a cheap graphical terminal that is still > being made, I just might buy one tonight :) "Grab a pentium from the > loading dock" doesn't count! it shouldn't be difficult to beat the gumstix on a pure cost basis. by the time you put together a complete computer with a power supply, ethernet and display, they're at least $300 without a case. if you want to go for a cheap atom, i think you can beat that price. - erik