From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <40271345.8040705@cox.net>
From: Chris Van Horne <cvanhorne@cox.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.6b) Gecko/20031221 Thunderbird/0.4
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] slow throughput on wavelan/epro100
References: <2935bcc643e24c92afff05f2224b1cd8@plan9.bell-labs.com>
In-Reply-To: <2935bcc643e24c92afff05f2224b1cd8@plan9.bell-labs.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Sun,  8 Feb 2004 21:57:41 -0700
Topicbox-Message-UUID: d39d738c-eacc-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025

Yep, ether{0,1} are both on IRQ 11.

David Presotto wrote:

>Check to see where plan9 decided to assign its interrupts (cat '#P'/irqalloc).
>Then check to see what they are on whatever OS you were running.
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Subject:
> [9fans] slow throughput on wavelan/epro100
> From:
> Chris Van Horne <cvanhorne@cox.net>
> Date:
> Sun, 08 Feb 2004 20:18:32 -0700
> To:
> 9fans@cse.psu.edu
>
> To:
> 9fans@cse.psu.edu
>
>
> I noticed yesterday after throwing p9 on a toshiba satellite 2805-S301
> under a Linksys WPC11 that the network throughput was a horrid 26
> kB/sec.  The onboard Intel epro100 gave only 640 kB/sec.  Anyone have
> some ideas that could lead to this or something I could try?
>
> Not sure what other information is needed, but:
> 128MB RAM, using fossil, disk doesn't feel sluggish.