From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <40282A43.1080307@nospam.com>
From: bs <bs@nospam.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] wireless/cellular connectivity?
References: <c0209158265680745fd3c761a063ad8c@9srv.net> <007901c3eef4$24856a20$67844051@SOMA>
In-Reply-To: <007901c3eef4$24856a20$67844051@SOMA>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Mon,  9 Feb 2004 19:48:03 -0500
Topicbox-Message-UUID: d7487856-eacc-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025

boyd, rounin wrote:
>>for clarity, i'm refering to the network, not the phones. they
>>have a derivative of one of the "main" networks (pretty sure
>>it's GSM) that just isn't compatable with the one used in the
>>rest of the world.
>
>
> there are 3 GSM nets:
>
>     900Mhz GSM [standard]
>     DCS 1800Mhz [GSM-ish]
>     1900Mhz GSM [US]
>
and 800(850 actually) used by Cingular & AT&T for transition
from TDMA