From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <405997F8.2080407@swtch.com> From: Russ Cox User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.5 (Windows/20040207) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu Subject: Re: [9fans] patch(1) References: <40589D28.9040806@swtch.com> <025b01c40cbc$73fdbbd0$8ed97d50@SOMA> In-Reply-To: <025b01c40cbc$73fdbbd0$8ed97d50@SOMA> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 07:37:12 -0500 Topicbox-Message-UUID: 36506250-eacd-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025 boyd, rounin wrote: >>On a more positive note, the discussion a few days ago did catch >>my attention by pointing out that Nemo had been submitting patches >>with patch(1). I found it so pleasant to apply the patches that I did >>the legwork to make patch(1) work for everyone. >> >> > >patch? nice idea, but when it goes wrong it goes horribly wrong. > > just once, it would be nice if you actually understood what was being said before you started spouting off criticizing it. see http://plan9.bell-labs.com/magic/man2html/1/patch, which has been posted here before. it's not what you think. russ