From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bakul Shah Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-1D6BF737-0F41-4BA5-8D24-299C78608572 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) Date: Fri, 9 Aug 2019 07:17:46 -0700 Message-Id: <40745EA5-3815-4E4F-9FE0-8F83697E74BA@bitblocks.com> References:

In-Reply-To: To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net> Subject: Re: [9fans] Plan 9 C compiler for Xtensa CPUs Topicbox-Message-UUID: 03999428-eada-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 --Apple-Mail-1D6BF737-0F41-4BA5-8D24-299C78608572 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable esp32 doesn=E2=80=99t have an mmu, right? > On Jul 26, 2019, at 03:30, Charles Forsyth wro= te: >=20 > I was thinking of doing that since I've got an ESP-32 for some reason >=20 >> On Fri, Jul 26, 2019 at 7:38 AM Cyber Fonic wrote:= >> I was reading the post Why Didn't Plan 9 Succeed on Hacker News. >>=20 >> Made me think that Plan 9 for IoT system of systems could be viable. >>=20 >> To that end, ESP-32 modules look capable enough to run Plan 9, but is the= re a Plan 9 C compiler for Xtensa ISA CPUs?=20 >>=20 --Apple-Mail-1D6BF737-0F41-4BA5-8D24-299C78608572 Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

esp= 32 doesn=E2=80=99t have an mmu, right?

On Jul 26, 2= 019, at 03:30, Charles Forsyth <charles.forsyth@gmail.com> wrote:

I was thinking of doing that since I= 've got an ESP-32 for some reason

On Fri, Jul 26, 2019 at 7:38 AM Cyber Fonic &= lt;cyberfonic@gmail.com> wrot= e:
I was reading the post Why Didn't Plan 9 Succeed on Hacker= News.

Made me think that Plan 9 for IoT system of system= s could be viable.

To that end, ESP-32 modules look= capable enough to run Plan 9, but is there a Plan 9 C compiler for Xtensa I= SA CPUs?

= --Apple-Mail-1D6BF737-0F41-4BA5-8D24-299C78608572--