From: Lucio De Re <lucio@proxima.alt.za>
To: 9fans@9fans.net
Subject: Re: [9fans] nix at lsub
Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2012 20:23:22 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <407b661b3cf85471a21f52303e8f0167@proxima.alt.za> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAE9W7-g-73-p0yKrYc0AJhkXxPEg-ZBT1WH7XvFqDMvQp79dTg@mail.gmail.com>
> IMO, there is nothing generally wrong with taking the path of least
> resistence, so long as open is open minded and also so long as it is not
> the only path being considered.
Except that by definition the path of least resistance is the only one
of its type. You buy the reason, you paint yourself in the corner. I
do grant that one may choose the path of least resistance for reasons
other than the ostensible one, but I doubt that would be anything more
than an accident. Can you see where my reasonaing takes me?
++L
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-04-19 18:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-04-18 18:05 arnold
2012-04-19 1:37 ` hiro
2012-04-19 4:15 ` Jeff Sickel
2012-04-19 8:10 ` Charles Forsyth
2012-04-19 8:16 ` Joseph Stewart
2012-04-19 8:46 ` Charles Forsyth
2012-04-19 10:03 ` Bakul Shah
2012-04-19 10:32 ` Charles Forsyth
2012-04-19 16:36 ` Bakul Shah
2012-04-19 15:50 ` ComeauAt9Fans@gmail.com
2012-04-19 16:11 ` Lucio De Re
2012-04-19 17:09 ` ComeauAt9Fans@gmail.com
2012-04-19 17:56 ` Lucio De Re
2012-04-19 18:05 ` Comeau At9Fans
2012-04-19 18:23 ` Lucio De Re [this message]
2012-04-19 18:27 ` Lucio De Re
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2012-04-18 16:09 arnold
2012-04-18 16:18 ` Nemo
2012-04-18 16:28 ` Charles Forsyth
2012-04-18 16:35 ` Francisco J Ballesteros
2012-04-18 17:43 ` Lucio De Re
2012-04-18 15:45 arnold
2012-04-18 15:49 ` Francisco J Ballesteros
2012-04-14 21:02 Nemo
2012-04-15 13:45 ` David Leimbach
2012-04-16 10:47 ` Francisco J Ballesteros
2012-04-16 11:02 ` Noah Evans
2012-04-16 17:23 ` Aram Hăvărneanu
2012-04-16 17:32 ` Noah Evans
2012-04-16 17:42 ` Noah Evans
2012-04-16 17:44 ` ron minnich
2012-04-16 20:53 ` Andrés Domínguez
[not found] ` <CAEAzY380ECzLQJCbNaK=QiYE6vzQpqTW3ZoakzW7EJ-WajptHg@mail.gmail.c>
2012-04-16 17:54 ` sl
2012-04-16 13:22 ` Christoph Lohmann
2012-04-16 18:04 ` Lucio De Re
2012-04-17 2:16 ` kokamoto
2012-04-17 5:53 ` andy zerger
2012-04-17 5:54 ` andy zerger
2012-04-17 7:17 ` Nemo
2012-04-17 8:41 ` kokamoto
2012-04-17 8:51 ` Francisco J Ballesteros
2012-04-17 12:22 ` Tristan
2012-04-17 18:56 ` Charles Forsyth
2012-04-17 19:13 ` Nemo
[not found] ` <charles.forsyth@gmail.com>
2012-04-18 0:26 ` kokamoto
2012-04-18 4:07 ` John Floren
2012-04-18 4:12 ` John Floren
2012-04-18 7:54 ` Francisco J Ballesteros
2012-04-18 12:27 ` Charles Forsyth
2012-04-18 12:35 ` Francisco J Ballesteros
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=407b661b3cf85471a21f52303e8f0167@proxima.alt.za \
--to=lucio@proxima.alt.za \
--cc=9fans@9fans.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).