From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <407b661b3cf85471a21f52303e8f0167@proxima.alt.za>
To: 9fans@9fans.net
From: Lucio De Re <lucio@proxima.alt.za>
Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2012 20:23:22 +0200
In-Reply-To: <CAE9W7-g-73-p0yKrYc0AJhkXxPEg-ZBT1WH7XvFqDMvQp79dTg@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [9fans] nix at lsub
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 78b82c36-ead7-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

> IMO, there is nothing generally wrong with taking the path of least
> resistence, so long as open is open minded and also so long as it is not
> the only path being considered.

Except that by definition the path of least resistance is the only one
of its type.  You buy the reason, you paint yourself in the corner.  I
do grant that one may choose the path of least resistance for reasons
other than the ostensible one, but I doubt that would be anything more
than an accident.  Can you see where my reasonaing takes me?

++L