From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <409a9964c8f20c0934ba6477744a2a89@terzarima.net> From: Charles Forsyth Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 09:54:53 +0100 To: 9fans@9fans.net In-Reply-To: <1245193951.9958.1909.camel@work> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [9fans] Different representations of the same Topicbox-Message-UUID: 0c18ac42-ead5-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 >The only drawback so far seems to be the fact that if one >needs flexibility, then every file becomes a subdirectory. >Not that it is scary or anything, but it smells too much >of resource forks (or may be I'm just too easily scared). it's the other way round: they ought to have represented collections of related data and metadata using directories instead of inventing rubbish like resource forks.