From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <40C56B70.90404@mipk.kharkiv.edu> Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2004 10:32:00 +0300 From: Vladimir Los User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20031007 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@cse.psu.edu> Subject: Re: [9fans] A prick into the wasps' nest ;-) References: <7359f049040607085354f3851c@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <7359f049040607085354f3851c@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Topicbox-Message-UUID: 988b52b8-eacd-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025 Rob Pike wrote: > acme and the acme paper were written many years ago, > when oberon was vastly less capable than it is now. > oberon was and is an interesting system; you know > what they say about imitation. Excme, Rob, what do they say about imitation? :o) > however, even today, i don't think oberon has an analog > to the key new idea in acme: acquisition with button 3. What's wrong with button 3? Have you any plans to add real-time features to Plan9 or Inferno? Where can I read about requirements to resources for minimum installation of Inferno? Did you heared about QNX? What is your oppinion about it?