From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <40C9D19F.6030303@yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2004 08:37:03 -0700
From: Matt Pidd-Cheshire <axwrt001@yahoo.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US;
	rv:1.7b) Gecko/20040421
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
Subject: Re: [9fans] freebsd v. plan9 - profile reusults (long)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 9c1dce9c-eacd-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025

> Why did you use kfs and not fossil, I wonder?

convenience...
the first time i installed 9e4 it did not offer me a choice.
i learned how to use kfs and, given the posts about the
occasional problems people seem to have with fossil - plus
the limited amount of space on my machine - kfs seemed a safe
if not adventurous option. i have other obstacles to overcome,
putting a new fs model in the way is not a priority.