From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <410fc6a0ebe2c0fd9258f119776183f4@proxima.alt.za>
To: 9fans@9fans.net
From: Lucio De Re <lucio@proxima.alt.za>
Date: Sat, 29 Oct 2011 18:08:27 +0200
In-Reply-To: <CAOw7k5iZRHvXsTRVvk7Z4B37ycBEY9KmUwS4XgijxjFFbu8YPw@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [9fans] ARM compiler shortcoming?
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 3bedeb60-ead7-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

> i've tried this example with a cc that has com64.c unchanged from sources
> (ie, without the change erik suggested),
> and a 5c that has no relevant changes at all, and it was fine.

I'm too stupid to reach the right conclusion from what you are saying:
does this mean that I have a dated 5c?  I'm not sure what Erik's
change is intended for, but I doubt it will fix the problem.

++L