Réf. : Re: [9fans] allow

Réf. : Re: [9fans] allow

[boyd.roberts]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 704 bytes --]




and who's gonna re-run it (authenticated) after a server crash?

plan 9 auth is pretty neat, but it bites you back too.



                                                                  
 (Embedded                                                        
 image moved   "Douglas A. Gwyn" <gwyn@arl.army.mil>              
 to file:      17/07/2000 17:11                                   
 pic15263.pcx)                                                    
                                                                  



Veuillez répondre à 9fans@cse.psu.edu

Pour: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
cc:    (ccc: Boyd ROBERTS/EST/DOSI/BANQUE_INDOSUEZ/FR)
Objet:    Re: [9fans] allow



[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 330 bytes --]


presotto@plan9.bell-labs.com wrote:
> Cron in such a system becomes much harder.  The cron process has to
> possess some of  my private keys in order to do it's job.

I don't see that -- surely a "user" could fire up its own cron-ish
process to perform scheduled tasks.  Why does there have to be a
centralized "cron"?


[-- Attachment #3: pic15263.pcx --]
[-- Type: application/octet-stream, Size: 2427 bytes --]