* Réf. : Re: [9fans] allow
@ 2000-07-17 16:08 boyd.roberts
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: boyd.roberts @ 2000-07-17 16:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9fans
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 704 bytes --]
and who's gonna re-run it (authenticated) after a server crash?
plan 9 auth is pretty neat, but it bites you back too.
(Embedded
image moved "Douglas A. Gwyn" <gwyn@arl.army.mil>
to file: 17/07/2000 17:11
pic15263.pcx)
Veuillez répondre à 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Pour: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
cc: (ccc: Boyd ROBERTS/EST/DOSI/BANQUE_INDOSUEZ/FR)
Objet: Re: [9fans] allow
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 330 bytes --]
presotto@plan9.bell-labs.com wrote:
> Cron in such a system becomes much harder. The cron process has to
> possess some of my private keys in order to do it's job.
I don't see that -- surely a "user" could fire up its own cron-ish
process to perform scheduled tasks. Why does there have to be a
centralized "cron"?
[-- Attachment #3: pic15263.pcx --]
[-- Type: application/octet-stream, Size: 2427 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2000-07-17 16:08 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2000-07-17 16:08 Réf. : Re: [9fans] allow boyd.roberts
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).