From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <414AE8BD.7090309@9fs.org>
Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2004 14:38:05 +0100
From: Nigel Roles <nigel@9fs.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.8 (X11/20040913)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
Subject: Re: [9fans] OT: ZFS
References: <032719f26456ca28b7efc3de473af7a5@plan9.escet.urjc.es>
In-Reply-To: <032719f26456ca28b7efc3de473af7a5@plan9.escet.urjc.es>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Topicbox-Message-UUID: e365bb02-eacd-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025


>>ahh, i suppose they probably mean "neither architecture pays a
>>byte-swapping tax *on a filesystem created by that architecture*", in
>>which case you're doing something equivalent.
>>    
>>
We think that they mean "both architecture are taxed the same". With all 
that
space in their 128 bit filesystem, they can store all the offsets in ASCII.