From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <4158a19ee9e8f2af3ca8c77c1fd842ac@quanstro.net>
From: erik quanstrom <quanstro@quanstro.net>
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 07:34:47 -0400
To: 9fans@9fans.net
In-Reply-To: <20090417063313.8DBC95B1B@mail.bitblocks.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Subject: Re: [9fans] security questions
Topicbox-Message-UUID: e0152242-ead4-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

> What if each user can have a separate IP stack, separate
> (virtualized) interfaces and so on?

already possible, but you do need 1 physical ethernet
per ip stack if you want to talk to the outside world.

> But you'd have to implement some sort of limits on
> oversubcribing (ratio of virtual to real resources). Unlike
> securitization in the hedge fund world.

this would add a lot of code and result in the same problem
as today — you can be run out of a criticial resource.

- erik