From: Dave Lukes <davel@anvil.com>
To: Russ Cox <russcox@gmail.com>,
Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
Subject: Re: [9fans] alright, this should be interesting
Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2004 12:13:28 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <41764858.90506@anvil.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ee9e417a041019211960b8f2a5@mail.gmail.com>
Russ,
Again, I think you miss the point: you are not the problem: the rest of
us are!
>Also, your particular example is definitely flawed:
>
> Kernels are also important in the sense that they set
> the tone for everything above them: kencc wouldn't have
> happened on linux, for example.
>
>The cleanliness of Plan 9's kernel and the cleanliness of
>the C compilers are definitely correlated, but not directly.
>They're clean because Ken was intimately involved in both.
>
>
See my other post: the key word here is "Ken": many others (myself
included) couldn't have.
Cheers,
Dave.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-10-20 11:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-10-05 17:36 andrey mirtchovski
2004-10-06 1:07 ` Kenji Okamoto
2004-10-06 1:25 ` andrey mirtchovski
2004-10-06 5:25 ` geoff
2004-10-06 7:52 ` C H Forsyth
2004-10-18 16:05 ` Leo Caves
2004-10-19 2:50 ` Kenji Okamoto
2004-10-19 15:44 ` Ronald G. Minnich
2004-10-19 15:57 ` Dave Lukes
2004-10-19 19:45 ` Tim Newsham
2004-10-19 21:22 ` Ronald G. Minnich
2004-10-19 22:47 ` Charles Forsyth
2004-10-19 23:39 ` Dave Lukes
2004-10-20 3:25 ` Tim Newsham
2004-10-20 9:46 ` Steve Simon
2004-10-20 14:20 ` Russ Cox
2004-10-20 19:47 ` Ronald G. Minnich
2004-10-20 20:29 ` Ronald G. Minnich
2004-10-20 20:41 ` boyd, rounin
2004-10-21 1:31 ` Tim Newsham
2004-10-21 16:19 ` Ronald G. Minnich
2004-10-19 23:17 ` Dave Lukes
2004-10-20 4:01 ` Tim Newsham
2004-10-20 4:19 ` Russ Cox
2004-10-20 4:27 ` Kenji Okamoto
2004-10-20 6:23 ` Skip Tavakkolian
2004-10-20 7:36 ` Nigel Roles
2004-10-20 11:20 ` Dave Lukes
2004-10-20 12:36 ` Nigel Roles
2004-10-20 13:45 ` Brantley Coile
2004-10-24 5:33 ` Dan Cross
2004-10-24 11:53 ` Tiit Lankots
2004-10-24 13:44 ` Brantley Coile
2004-10-25 11:23 ` Dave Lukes
2004-10-20 17:06 ` Skip Tavakkolian
2004-10-22 7:12 ` Dave Lukes
2004-10-22 19:02 ` Jason Gurtz
2004-10-23 1:27 ` Dave Lukes
2004-10-20 18:40 ` boyd, rounin
2004-10-20 20:16 ` Nigel Roles
2004-10-20 20:46 ` boyd, rounin
2004-10-20 19:59 ` Ronald G. Minnich
2004-10-20 20:02 ` Russ Cox
2004-10-20 20:05 ` Eric Van Hensbergen
2004-10-20 20:25 ` Charles Forsyth
2004-10-20 20:48 ` boyd, rounin
2004-10-21 18:36 ` Dave Lukes
2004-10-21 4:47 ` William Josephson
2004-10-20 20:44 ` boyd, rounin
2004-10-23 18:54 ` Dan Cross
2004-10-20 11:13 ` Dave Lukes [this message]
2004-10-20 11:09 ` Dave Lukes
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=41764858.90506@anvil.com \
--to=davel@anvil.com \
--cc=9fans@cse.psu.edu \
--cc=russcox@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).