From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: erik quanstrom Date: Fri, 9 May 2014 16:44:51 -0400 To: 9fans@9fans.net Message-ID: <41ab952ad099c8e959649088b919a620@ladd.quanstro.net> In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [9fans] what arch Topicbox-Message-UUID: e5130878-ead8-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 > Also, from the Akaros side, we've extended the Plan 9 MSI code to > support MSI-X and tested it on real hardware; works fine. This allowed > us to stop worrying about ACPI; you don't need it if you do MSI-X. > Relief! And MSI-X is in some ways easier than MSI. i don't see how this could be the case for some pretty common hardware. for example, i have yet to see a usb controller that will do either msi or msi-x. for example, on this machine (random intel) ; pci |grep usb 0.26.0: usb 0c.03.20 8086/1c2d 11 0:fbc23000 1024 0.29.0: usb 0c.03.20 8086/1c26 5 0:fbc22000 1024 ; pci -vc 0.26.0 0.29.0 0.26.0: pwrmgmt/01 dbgprt/0a advfeat/13 0.29.0: pwrmgmt/01 dbgprt/0a advfeat/13 nope. it's i/o apic interrupts for me! unless there's some magic way to convert i/o apic into msi-x that i don't know about. hoping this is the case.... - erik