From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: erik quanstrom <quanstro@labs.coraid.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2012 13:07:49 -0500
To: 9fans@9fans.net
Message-ID: <420ea21bfa6b17dde6a39c10116de187@coraid.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAOw7k5gmafeG9upUmjKhgB=9kyoyO0+sUJ_eySu3URfXw=6Wdg@mail.gmail.c>
References: <81ab20f06c1b8b20cf869565b01e2e29@chula.quanstro.net>
	<CAOw7k5gmafeG9upUmjKhgB=9kyoyO0+sUJ_eySu3URfXw=6Wdg@mail.gmail.c>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [9fans] small dns improvements
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 5d5241f2-ead7-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

On Mon Jan 16 13:03:20 EST 2012, charles.forsyth@gmail.com wrote:

> that one's not inherently fatal, in the sense that it shouldn't stop the
> search.
>
> On 16 January 2012 17:13, erik quanstrom <quanstro@quanstro.net> wrote:
>
> > 2.  we're ignoring status codes that we should be treating as fatal (like
> > Srvfail)

also, i forgot that it's possible to return Srvfail and return some RRs.  these
all need to be ignored.  we weren't ignoring them in the past.

- erik