From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: erik quanstrom <quanstro@quanstro.net>
Date: Fri,  8 Jul 2011 13:04:53 -0400
To: 9fans@9fans.net
Message-ID: <42238e75050e3e65ace758f50a089249@ladd.quanstro.net>
In-Reply-To: <CAP6exYKc4mXGWQi7a06a3tkhDe+z+VCX-z2BhapaSq=ZNYpPJg@mail.gmail.c>
References: <20110706184008.AC595B827@mail.bitblocks.com>
	<CALDPdrpH+G1VS_y5BvwgtmQsb1iLfx_c3VDeM1YeeyqJ6YLxKQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<20110708061922.1CEB3B827@mail.bitblocks.com>
	<856dd0396cfa3bdef849de6d15d42da8@coraid.com>
	<CAP6exYKc4mXGWQi7a06a3tkhDe+z+VCX-z2BhapaSq=ZNYpPJg@mail.gmail.c>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Subject: Re: [9fans] 9atom & virtualbox 4.0.10 networking issue
Topicbox-Message-UUID: fc339ad8-ead6-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

> Why is it not fixed? Because, nowadays, the thing you're supposed to
> use is the ACPI table. We've seen cases where both PIR and _MP_ were
> copied from a different motherboard, with no change, and were
> completely wrong. It's obvious that most vendors don't care to take
> the time to make these tables right.

so why are acpi tables also broken?

☺

- erik