From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Matt <matt@proweb.co.uk>
Message-ID: <4258988310.20011007102601@proweb.co.uk>
To: Lucio De Re <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
Subject: Re[2]: [9fans] mv vs cp
In-Reply-To: <20011007111715.M28720@cackle.proxima.alt.za>
References: <20011007082859.I28720@cackle.proxima.alt.za>
 <20011007064220.188F1742E2@hork.ugcs.caltech.edu>
 <20011007111715.M28720@cackle.proxima.alt.za>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Sun,  7 Oct 2001 10:26:01 +0100
Topicbox-Message-UUID: ff8e1b70-eac9-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025



LDR> All I can say in self-defence is that user convenience is being
LDR> sacrificed here (I ought to know, but I can't remember how the
LDR> various Windows flavours deal with the problem) and the sacrifice
LDR> may be greater than the gain in simplicity.

win2k doesn't copy the file